Where is the Pirates’ Matt Moore?

No matter what happens in the remainder of this postseason, one of my favorite stories is going to be Joe Maddon turning to Matt Moore in Game 1 of the ALDS. Moore started the year out as Baseball America’s 15th best prospect after dominating in the Florida State League in 2010 as a 21-year old, striking out 208 hitters in 144 2/3 innings. He opened up 2011 in Double-A and was even better, dropping his walk rate from 3.8 BB/9 in the FSL to 2.5 BB/9 in the Southern League. After 18 starts he was promoted to Durham to end the season and made nine dominating starts there, striking out 79 and walking walking 18 in 52 2/3 innings.

When Durham’s season ended, he was promotoed to Tampa Bay and used sparingly from the ‘pen until the Rays needed a starter after losing a double-header on September 21st. In a must-win game, Moore struck out 11 Yankees in five innings. He didn’t pitch again in the regular season, but that performance earned him a spot in Tampa’s post-season rotation over Wade Davis and Jeff Nieman and he started Game 1 against the Rangers, dominating in seven two-hit, shutout innings, striking out six and walking two. If the Rays win this afternoon, he will presumably start the decisive Game 5 of the ALDS.

You might expect this sort of thing out of a highly-touted high school prospect like Jameson Taillon, but Moore was an eighth round pick by the Rays in 2007. He signed for $115,0000 (above slot but not huge; the Pirates gave ninth rounder Clay Holmes $1.2 million this year, which is one of the bigger bonuses ever outside of the top five rounds, I think) early enough to make eight GCL appearances. If you’re noting similarities between Moore and the types of pitchers the Pirates like to take in the early-middle rounds of the draft, you’re not alone. When I was on 93.7’s Late Shift with Chris Mueller last week, we talked a bit about the state of the minor league system and Chris asked me, “With all of the minor league arms the Pirates have drafted in the last few years, where’s their Matt Moore?”

The a relatively straightforward answer, which is what I gave, is that the Pirates have tended to emphasize command (especially fastball command) a lot more than other teams in the low minors, which seemingly keeps their young pitchers from putting up dominant numbers in Short Season and Single-A. That’s probably true to an extent, but the pitcher that’s obviously the most talented in the system (Jameson Taillon) didn’t go to State College the way most of the Pirates’ high school pitching prospects do and still looked like he was a good bit more advanced than the other pitching prospects in West Virginia this year, despite being a year younger than them.

It’s those West Virginia arms that tell us the most about the Neal Huntington/Kyle Stark approach. They were all drafted in 2009, which was the first year that the Pirates focused on high school arms in the draft, and so they’ve been in the system the most time. Let’s look at the 20-year olds from that team:

Zack Von Rosenberg

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	GF	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2009	18	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	0	0	0.00	1	1	0	1.0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	3	0.000	0.0	0.0	0.0	9.0
2010	19	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	1	6	3.20	13	13	0	59.0	60	24	21	4	13	39	2	0	0	246	1.237	9.2	0.6	2.0	5.9	3.00
2011	20	West Virginia	SALL	A	PIT	5	9	5.73	27	25	1	125.2	143	86	80	19	23	114	10	3	2	534	1.321	10.2	1.4	1.6	8.2	4.96
3 Seasons						6	15	4.90	41	39	1	185.2	203	110	101	23	36	154	12	3	2	783	1.287	9.8	1.1	1.7	7.5	4.28

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Zack Dodson

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2009	18	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	0	0	0.00	1	0	1.0	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0	3	0.000	0.0	0.0	0.0	9.0
2010	19	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	2	6	4.84	15	13	57.2	57	34	31	2	27	41	5	6	252	1.457	8.9	0.3	4.2	6.4	1.52
2011	20	3 Teams	3 Lgs	A-A–Rk	PIT	6	6	3.10	20	20	93.0	91	44	32	6	22	66	9	4	389	1.215	8.8	0.6	2.1	6.4	3.00
2011	20	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	0	1	4.15	3	3	8.2	8	5	4	1	3	7	0	0	37	1.269	8.3	1.0	3.1	7.3	2.33
2011	20	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	0	1	4.58	4	4	17.2	22	12	9	2	4	13	5	1	82	1.472	11.2	1.0	2.0	6.6	3.25
2011	20	West Virginia	SALL	A	PIT	6	4	2.56	13	13	66.2	61	27	19	3	15	46	4	3	270	1.140	8.2	0.4	2.0	6.2	3.07
3 Seasons						8	12	3.74	36	33	151.2	148	78	63	8	49	108	14	10	644	1.299	8.8	0.5	2.9	6.4	2.20
Rk (2 seasons)				Rk		0	1	3.72	4	3	9.2	8	5	4	1	3	8	0	0	40	1.138	7.4	0.9	2.8	7.4	2.67
A- (2 seasons)				A-		2	7	4.78	19	17	75.1	79	46	40	4	31	54	10	7	334	1.460	9.4	0.5	3.7	6.5	1.74
A (1 season)				A		6	4	2.56	13	13	66.2	61	27	19	3	15	46	4	3	270	1.140	8.2	0.4	2.0	6.2	3.07

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Brooks Pounders

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	GF	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2009	18	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	2	2	3.04	9	4	2	23.2	19	11	8	1	11	20	1	2	99	1.268	7.2	0.4	4.2	7.6	1.82
2010	19	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	3	3	4.46	16	4	3	42.1	40	26	21	5	15	29	5	4	186	1.299	8.5	1.1	3.2	6.2	1.93
2011	20	West Virginia	SALL	A	PIT	5	5	3.68	36	1	13	66.0	61	29	27	9	14	72	13	4	283	1.136	8.3	1.2	1.9	9.8	5.14
3 Seasons						10	10	3.82	61	9	18	132.0	120	66	56	15	40	121	19	10	568	1.212	8.2	1.0	2.7	8.2	3.03

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Colton Cain

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	GF	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2010	19	2 Teams	2 Lgs	A–Rk	PIT	1	2	4.66	15	13	1	48.1	35	25	25	3	19	47	3	0	204	1.117	6.5	0.6	3.5	8.8	2.47
2010	19	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	0	1	3.77	4	4	0	14.1	12	6	6	1	5	15	0	0	61	1.186	7.5	0.6	3.1	9.4	3.00
2010	19	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	1	1	5.03	11	9	1	34.0	23	19	19	2	14	32	3	0	143	1.088	6.1	0.5	3.7	8.5	2.29
2011	20	West Virginia	SALL	A	PIT	6	8	3.64	24	19	1	106.1	92	55	43	6	31	81	12	6	444	1.157	7.8	0.5	2.6	6.9	2.61
2 Seasons						7	10	3.96	39	32	2	154.2	127	80	68	9	50	128	15	6	648	1.144	7.4	0.5	2.9	7.4	2.56

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Zac Fuesser

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	GF	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2009	18	Pirates	GULF	Rk	PIT	1	1	1.26	5	1	0	14.1	6	4	2	0	10	12	0	2	2	57	1.116	3.8	0.0	6.3	7.5	1.20
2010	19	State College	NYPL	A-	PIT	0	4	3.64	15	10	1	54.1	54	25	22	3	27	47	2	3	4	244	1.491	8.9	0.5	4.5	7.8	1.74
2011	20	West Virginia	SALL	A	PIT	3	6	3.74	32	11	7	108.1	111	50	45	14	33	95	8	3	3	450	1.329	9.2	1.2	2.7	7.9	2.88
3 Seasons						4	11	3.51	52	22	8	177.0	171	79	69	17	70	154	10	8	9	751	1.362	8.7	0.9	3.6	7.8	2.20

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

All of their walk rates are improving, though some more dramatically than others. Their strikeout rates vary quite a bit. Von Rosenberg and Pounders took big leaps forward in strikeouts this year, Fuesser’s been constant, Cain and Dodson noticeably dipped but had arguably the best results. The pitcher who was best peripherally, Von Rosenberg, got absolutely pounded until the end of the season. I’m willing to take all of these results with a grain of salt, but certainly there’s no one at this level (besides Taillon) that’s separated themselves from the pack yet.

Now let’s look at the minor league histories of two pitchers in the Rays’ rotation, Moore and Jeremy Hellickson (a fourth round high school pick in 2005, which means he wasn’t drafted by Friedman but entered the system when he was Director of player Development). Two upper-mid round high school picks that have made it.

Matt Moore

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2007	18	Princeton	APPY	Rk	TBD	0	0	2.66	8	3	20.1	12	6	6	1	16	29	2	0	2	93	1.377	5.3	0.4	7.1	12.8	1.81
2008	19	Princeton	APPY	Rk	TBR	2	2	1.66	12	12	54.1	30	22	10	0	19	77	4	0	4	221	0.902	5.0	0.0	3.1	12.8	4.05
2009	20	Bowling Green	SALL	A	TBR	8	5	3.15	26	26	123.0	86	51	43	6	70	176	6	0	13	522	1.268	6.3	0.4	5.1	12.9	2.51
2010	21	Charlotte	FLOR	A+	TBR	6	11	3.36	26	26	144.2	109	62	54	7	61	208	8	2	10	598	1.175	6.8	0.4	3.8	12.9	3.41
2011	22	2 Teams	2 Lgs	AA-AAA	TBR	12	3	1.92	27	27	155.0	101	39	33	11	46	210	6	1	7	604	0.948	5.9	0.6	2.7	12.2	4.57
2011	22	Montgomery	SOUL	AA	TBR	8	3	2.20	18	18	102.1	68	31	25	8	28	131	5	1	3	400	0.938	6.0	0.7	2.5	11.5	4.68
2011	22	Durham	IL	AAA	TBR	4	0	1.37	9	9	52.2	33	8	8	3	18	79	1	0	4	204	0.968	5.6	0.5	3.1	13.5	4.39
5 Seasons						28	21	2.64	99	94	497.1	338	180	146	25	212	700	26	3	36	2038	1.106	6.1	0.5	3.8	12.7	3.30

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Jeremy Hellickson

Year	Age	Tm	Lg	Lev	Aff	W	L	ERA	G	GS	GF	IP	H	R	ER	HR	BB	IBB	SO	HBP	BK	WP	BF	WHIP	H/9	HR/9	BB/9	SO/9	SO/BB
2005	18	Princeton	APPY	Rk	TBD	0	0	6.00	4	0	1	6.0	6	4	4	1	1	0	11	1	0	0	27	1.167	9.0	1.5	1.5	16.5	11.00
2006	19	Hudson Valley	NYPL	A-	TBD	4	3	2.43	15	14	0	77.2	55	24	21	3	16	0	96	6	0	4	309	0.914	6.4	0.3	1.9	11.1	6.00
2007	20	Columbus	SALL	A	TBD	13	3	2.67	21	21	0	111.1	87	36	33	7	34	0	106	3	0	4	446	1.087	7.0	0.6	2.7	8.6	3.12
2008	21	2 Teams	2 Lgs	A+-AA	TBR	11	5	2.96	27	27	0	152.0	148	55	50	22	20	1	162	6	1	4	604	1.105	8.8	1.3	1.2	9.6	8.10
2008	21	Vero Beach	FLOR	A+	TBR	7	1	2.00	14	14	0	76.2	64	19	17	7	5	0	83	4	1	3	296	0.900	7.5	0.8	0.6	9.7	16.60
2008	21	Montgomery	SOUL	AA	TBR	4	4	3.94	13	13	0	75.1	84	36	33	15	15	1	79	2	0	1	308	1.314	10.0	1.8	1.8	9.4	5.27
2009	22	2 Teams	2 Lgs	AAA-AA	TBR	9	2	2.45	20	20	0	114.0	72	35	31	8	29	0	132	8	0	3	446	0.886	5.7	0.6	2.3	10.4	4.55
2009	22	Montgomery	SOUL	AA	TBR	3	1	2.38	11	11	0	56.2	41	16	15	4	14	0	62	4	0	1	226	0.971	6.5	0.6	2.2	9.8	4.43
2009	22	Durham	IL	AAA	TBR	6	1	2.51	9	9	0	57.1	31	19	16	4	15	0	70	4	0	2	220	0.802	4.9	0.6	2.4	11.0	4.67
2010	23	2 Teams	2 Lgs	AAA-A+	TBR	12	3	2.72	22	21	0	119.1	107	39	36	5	37	0	127	7	0	0	494	1.207	8.1	0.4	2.8	9.6	3.43
2010	23	Charlotte	FLOR	A+	TBR	0	0	21.60	1	0	0	1.2	4	4	4	0	2	0	4	0	0	0	11	3.600	21.6	0.0	10.8	21.6	2.00
2010	23	Durham	IL	AAA	TBR	12	3	2.45	21	21	0	117.2	103	35	32	5	35	0	123	7	0	0	483	1.173	7.9	0.4	2.7	9.4	3.51
6 Seasons						49	16	2.71	109	103	1	580.1	475	193	175	46	137	1	634	31	1	15	2326	1.055	7.4	0.7	2.1	9.8	4.63

Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/4/2011.

Both Rays’ pitchers followed relatively the same path as the Pirates are laying out for their non-Taillon high schoolers, Short Season at 19 (Hellickson did the New York Penn League, the same as the Pirates’ pitchers, Moore did a full stint in the GCL), Single-A at 20, then they were allowed to rise as fast as their performance let them. I don’t know what the Rays stress in their low minors for their pitchers, but I’ll point out that neither Moore nor Hellickson (nor Alex Cobb, another high school draftee in 2006 who spent time in the Rays’ rotation this year) throw a slider.

I point that out for the obvious reason: the Pirates don’t necessarily come out and say it, but it seems to me that part of the reason they stress fastball command in the low minors is to give young arms a year off from throwing breaking pitches after high school careers when their arms were likely abused. Throwing sliders is generally thought to be bad for the arm and thus far (though it’s early, of course), the Rays have had very good luck with the health of their young pitchers (I’ll go on to add that David Price does through a slider, though he throws it much less in 2011 than he did early in his career, but he was also a college pick and came to the Rays much more advanced than guys like Moore and Hellickson, and that Wade Davis throws a slider, but he was drafted in 2004, which was Friedman’s first year with the organization in any capacity). It’s overly simplistic to think that by limiting sliders the Rays are avoiding pitching injuries from now until forever, but it’s worth noting simply because it points pretty clearly to an organization-wide strategy that exists, similar to what the Pirates have, but that is obviously different judging by Moore’s strikeout/walk numbers in Single-A in 2009.

I’m not really of the belief that a pitcher has to “dominate” at every level to become a good big league pitcher. Roy Halladay never had great numbers in the minors. At first that was because the Jays rushed him through the system (he started his 19-year old season in Advanced-A and spent most of his 20 year old season in Triple-A), but even when he more or less repeated Triple-A at 21 and even when he came back down at 23 after a disastrous season in Toronto, he didn’t have great numbers. None of these Pirate pitchers are Roy Halladay, of course, but the lesson stands that the main lesson is about what a pitcher becomes, not what he is in the low minors.

That being said, the early careers of Moore and Hellickson are strikingly different than the early careers of the high school pitchers drafted by Neal Huntington and Greg Smith in the mid-early rounds of the draft. Is it because the Pirates are worse at identifying this sort of talent than the Rays, or is it because the Pirates’ development system is masking what’s there? If the answer is the latter, then the question transforms into why the Pirates are doing what they’re doing. Is it making these kids better in the long run? Is it holding them back?

If I had to guess, I’d say that I suspect that the answer to these questions is that the Pirates simply aren’t as good as identifying this sort of talent as the Rays are, but I really can’t say for certain. I do think we’re going to have a much better idea of what the answer to these sorts of questions are after the 2012 season. Fuesser, Cain, and Von Rosenberg (at least: there might be room for more depending on where Gerrit Cole goes/how long he stays in Bradenton if he starts in the FSL) should all be in Advanced-A and they should all be at the points in their careers where the Pirates allow them to open things up a little bit, which will tell us a lot more about them than the first two years of their careers have. The Pirates don’t need every single pitcher they draft after the first round to turn into Moore or Hellickson, but seeing it happen to one or two would sure give me a lot more faith in more than one aspect of this front office.

About Pat Lackey